Here’s an editorial I wrote for The Hillsdale Collegian that wasn’t published because I was too lazy to edit it:
As I read over the Hillsdale College Student Pledge, it becomes increasingly clear that the inception of this document resulted from a question raised in a cigar-filled administrative meeting and that this question went something like this: “Gentlemen, while we are doing are best to exclude minorities, liberals, homosexuals, and young people of differing religious and political beliefs, are we, however, doing enough?”
“No!” was the resounding answer.
“Ah, as I thought,” responded the speaker. “Hand me a pen.”
Okay, maybe these weren’t the exact chain of events, but the braggadocio our regularly personable Cap’n has put behind this literarily and intellectually offensive ideological compact makes you wonder.
All perspective freshmen are now required to sign the pledge—however it was created—if they hope to part of the illustrious 82% of students accepted to the college.
If you would, please turn with me now to this piece of philosophical xenophobia reprinted in the back of your student planners.
My two primary contentions with the pledge itself are repeated affirmations of a belief in (1) platonic forms and (2) God. The pledge contains three references to either seeking or loving “the good” and two explicit shout-outs to the Almighty.
Principled students who are atheistic, agnostic, Buddhist, and polytheistic would object to the references concerning a vague Masonic deity, and students—well-read, Christian, or otherwise—might object to the ideological nods to antiquity’s favorite pederast.
Who’s left? Conveniently enough, it’s tight-lipped Republican Party hacks the administration would love to usher in under this umbrella of fat empty civil religion.
What’s worse, it excludes our best professors and finest while demanding discoursive stagnation from the remainders.
Even more repugnant to the idea of a liberal arts institution is the school’s requirement that incoming students sign an ideological statement of any kind. What’s the point of college if not to meditate on such gravely important issues as the existence of God and the order of the cosmos? If you’ve got it already figured out, try writing a book for the wayward students rejected by Hillsdale’s new admission policy.
If all this paints the intentions of the administration as insidious, I am pleased. The reason for the existence of this ceremony is a mixture of the falling reasons:
- To extract money from donors with a document these unfortunates might incorrectly misconstrue as meaningful.
- To increase the percentage of rich white boring conservatives attending the college.
This is not what any college, especially ours, should be about. Politics and religion should be studied as academic fields—not perverted for the personal gain of a few undeservingly powerful men at this potentially great institution.
Hillsdale, it’s time to let go of the coattails of Tony Snow and clean house.