I’ve been fairly cautious in comparing neoconservatives, in all their shamelessness, to nationalists or fascists. Hillsdale-apple-eye culture alarmist and radio talk (yep) show host Michael Medved presented a lecture, based loosely on the week’s topic of war on film and steeped in anachronistic superlatives, at tonight’s CCA. He was a charlatan but respectably reprobate in his propagandistic delivery. Consider:
1.) Romanticizing the nation’s military-cultural past.
Medved praised an apparently protestants’ people Hollywood of the WWII era. The town’s aspiring were dime store girls and farm boys who loved democracy and were ready to join a brother in arms as soon as they’d let ‘em. Directors, too, made “classic” war films which rallied the people behind the noblest of all causes–war.
Medved further failed to mention the prevailing Communist (and anti-American) sympathy in Hollywood at the time, and the then ironic fact that many films were ethnocentric glorifications of warfare, pilage, and democracy as a cure-all.
2.) Constructing and polorizing classes.
In a socialist vein, a number of his complaints against Hollywood, liberals, anti-war activists, and non-supporters of the president were anti-privilege/intellectual. Look, he said, at the rich Ivy Leaguers trying to implement the Marxist literary theory they learned at that elite leftist school of theirs. Contrast this to the average nuclear-family-loving Ohio Baptist farmer and straight ticket Republican voter (aka righteous proletariat).
3.) Renaming and rewiring.
How to raise support for the war on Iraq? Compare it to a war with strong public support like WWI and WWII. By renaming the Cold War (including Vietnam) WWIII and Iraq (and beyond) WWIV, he rewired impression of the two most recent wars to correspond with the previous two. Even better, according to Medved, not only was the Vietnam War justified–we won it.
4.) Elevated and dated (wartime/warlike) speech.
5.) The Lord is on our side as we honorably fight a people of darkness.
6.) Peace is suspect; war is glorious.
7.) You are against us if you are not for us.
And was the fraud of a nationalist met by criticism from historically and constitutionally aware students and donors? Or was he given an unsettlingly spirited standing ovation?
It makes one want to fly the sickle and hammer before thinking better.